Juno 2
Lots of buzz in the last year for this film. Juno is the story of a 16-year-old girl (Juno) and the effect her pregnancy has on her life. We get to know Juno’s family, friends, and the couple who will adopt her baby.
With an armful of glowing reviews and award nominations, Juno went into my DVD player with the weight of my high expectations. The good news is that some of them were met. The bad news is that some weren’t. Let’s address the bad news first.
First up is the faux-stop-animation title sequence. I LOVED the feel of the them. They were a great way to set a tone for Juno, but much as I did when I watched Superbad, I felt that they could have been used to greater effect. We got the hand-drawn heading of the sections, but I expected that Juno or Paulie would be an artist, making the drawings more relevant.
A bigger problem was 20 minutes of “Hey, look how quirky and in your face Juno is! She’s quirky, isn’t she? ISN’T SHE!?!” that started the film. Honestly, it was so over-the-top with the hamburger phone and the hoodie and the shiznit-remarking and the pipe and the moving the recliner and . . . I wanted to punch somebody. They just tried way too hard, even down to her name. Fortunately, after the first twenty minutes they eased up a little bit and the film got exponentially better.
Once we get past the set up of super-quirky Juno, the film really takes off. Ellen Page (above, with baby’ daddy Michael Cera) is quite talented, and ably heads the cast. Her transition from pre-pregnancy childhood to maturity is flawed, making it more real than I’ve grown to expect from most films. Writer Diablo Cody presents Juno with choices and decisions that aren’t neat and tidy, then explores some of the effects of those decisions.
One avenue that I wish had been explored more fully was Paulie Bleeker’s reaction to the news of Juno’s pregnancy. He just kind of goes along with whatever decisions Juno makes and doesn’t really give it much more thought. As always, I wish Cera had more to do in Juno.
On the other hand, by leaving Paulie’s point of view unaddressed, the film stays firmly focused on the female character, a phenomenon that’s sadly under-represented in cinema.
I also liked Jennifer Garner’s and Jason Bateman’s performances (above) in Juno as Vanessa and Mark Loring, the couple who wanted to adopt Juno’s baby. Looking back at it, it’s pretty obvious from the beginning that their situation was something less than the perfection that they tried to project with their McMansion (Thank you to director Jason Reitman for including that. I hate those stupid houses, devoid of any life or character.).
It was sad to watch Mark realize that he was living the wrong life, and to watch Vanessa try to convince him to hold it together. Juno’s final solution surprised me, and I’m not sure if I agree with it in general, but in her case, it was the right decision. One stellar piece of direction showed up in that section, specifically when Juno pulled off the highway.
So overall, Juno is a good film. Not Oscar-worthy, but good. I’m not sure why it got the Oscar nominations, other than possibly for the scene I just mentioned. Whatever the reason, I’m glad a film like this got some extra attention, if for no other reason than to get me to see it.







WordPress Powered